TRANSPARENCY Who was so good to keep the program that the list "Gessopalena open community," he disclosed during the election campaign will see that among the principles as "work style" there is also transparency. But beware administrative transparency is the basis of the recent decree Brunetta (150/2009). So in addition to her promise, transparency is legally due. The objective of the reform is to facilitate public access to information, and this in particular through the creation of institutional websites. Actually the town of Gessopalena already had an official website set up in the last phase of the administration Manzi but then promptly abandoned by Innaurato.
Now at last there is a site of the City of Gessopalena but has significant flaws with respect to the statutory requirements. In fact, in the name of the utmost clarity Directive No. 8 of 2009 of the Minister for Public Administration and Innovation provides between the contents required the names of the heads of individual offices with their addresses (phone and certified mail) and the leaders and the Secretary will be published curricula and salaries. Going on our site ( http://www.comune.gessopalena.ch.it/ ) soon realizes that there are missing curricula and salaries (eccenzion made to the Secretary )!!!! Under "transparency, evaluation and merit" should be present, as well as curriculum and salaries, the costs made by the City (entry and exit), the advice, the three-year program for transparency and by the absence rates and improved staff attendance! Strangely, these indexes are completely absent. To be fair it must be said that according to a recent article published in http://www.primadanoi.it/index.php shows that only 1% of the municipalities in the province of Chieti are in order with the intent of the law. So we are always among the last, but at least this time in good company!! of the much acclaimed transparency there is no trace either in the course of administration! We list a number of situations which show a behavior of Innaurato obscurity:
- start with an episode about the past administration (always Innaurato license plate). One of the last acts of his term in office is the one with which it was sold to the communal oven. Of this we have discussed several times, highlighting the fact that it was selling a "hidden" and therefore not immediately apparent. Besides the lack of a public notice the property was passed to a ruin and even recommend the resolution at which the sale was deliberately made no reference al'ex communal oven. If this is transparency !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- The program administration is planned participatory budgeting is to say that part of the budget (20% ) should be decided by the citizens. Pity then that the budget was approved at a board meeting held in the middle of the week at a time far from accessible to the face of transparency !!!!!
- Our mayor has always posed as a missionary of the supporting policy of not receiving public money, but instead it turned out that the benefit from the mayor did not take because it took that as president of the mountain community! ! And now that the allowance has been removed as president has returned to take that as Mayor !!!!!!!
- Needless to tell you the difficulties that our group has met to date in carrying out the minority. Consider that we had to use a dozen times to the prefect of enforcing our rights especially with regard to access to the files!
- The work done by the most important is undoubtedly the "re- the square M. Turks. " Do you think the work was absent during the so-called "cartel construction "which among other things should show:-the type of intervention to be implemented;-general of the designer, the director-general of the works; general manager for safety. Then when the job is public should be run: - The total amount of work with the division between the base bid amount, amounts, and security charges (direct and indirect) - discount applied for the award on the contract; single-lead procedure and duration of the work. It is necessary to point out that the "yard sign" is not taken into view only by supervisors but also by the population to understand how to be amended the territory! Obviously, the lack of exposure of the cartel produces the violation of important rules (eg Leg. No. 81/2008) and carries administrative penalties. And this is a classic example of transparency??
So we could go on forever but we stopped here finally emphasizing the complete absence of "contact" between the administration and citizens. See an administrator in the square could mean having hallucinations! So far no public meeting but not a manifest information. Absolute silence on issues that hit the city directly as a refund of the fee purification the TARSU, civic uses, etc ... ... ..
you tell us where is the transparency !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TO SPACE LABORATORY, exhibition area of \u200b\u200bthe craft workshop "The frame" No way to lift 9 to Canterbury, was inaugurated today at 18.00 the exhibition entitled 'MADE IN TAIWAN'. 
