On March published an article in "The Center" that the external review of the Regional Ombudsman concerning the reimbursement of the fee for purification. We show the first article and follow the letter of the same ombudsman.
Gessopalena. "The sewage charges unduly paid shall be refunded to all users HOLDING service and not just those connected to public sewer, with its own resources to ensure that sewage treatment. " After the agency context (ATO), including the regional ombudsman, the attorney Giuliano Grossi, takes a stand against Sasi, the water service company, whose chairman Domenico Scutti had narrowly construed the Ministerial Decree refers to the payment of the fee for purification. Sasi's assertions can not be accepted primarily because it "is not supported by the fact that the ATO has defined the scope of the decree for matters relating to the reimbursement," says Grossi In a letter to the President of Sasi, Scutti, and the Council of the City of minority Gessopalena, Tullio Bozzi, promoter of the battle of appeals, "On the contrary, the agency has repeatedly urged the field to repay Sasi all those who had paid fees to have the service without purification. According to the Constitutional Court, the fee is the fee for a service that does not exist in this case, "says the lawyer, according to which the self-purification by Sasi invoked the right to reimbursement for witness precisely the lack of service, and then the absence of the fee. The Ombudsman therefore calls on the company's water service to review the criteria for the return of overpaid and not to issue more bills that contain the proportion of treatment in countries where this does not exist, as they represent "an illicit enrichment for the same Sasi.
0 comments:
Post a Comment