will be interesting what a city council convened Monday for 'November 22 at 18. Let's start with the observed persistence of the Mayor to convene the council in weekdays without any plausible justification. At least this time it was changed to the time we start at 18 instead of 19!
Several news than expected. E 'was added to our question with which we are going to ask the reasons for the delay of the work of upgrading the Piazzale M. Turks. Perhaps the suspicions cast, following the written response that seemed to highlight the unwillingness to put the question among the topics of discussion in the Council should have made reflect the majority of directors (this is, if confirmed, would have a better news!). the problem of this delay is not trivial. From June the main entrance to City Hall is inaccessible! Disruptions were created to different associations that have headquarters in the asylum (AVIS and the various choirs). Of course all these months have been inaccessible public toilets. The work in progress all summer has forbidden the square of be natural that theater has always been home to summer festivals of all genres (theater, music, debates and even sports). The show "Good taste" had to resize the party food that takes place in the yard! Do not forget that the site is adjacent to a business that had to bear the consequences for the entire summer of work carried out in a few steps from the entrance! Add to this site that often (poorly fenced) was accessible to children 3 years and the risk that each of you can imagine, it is clear to all that the problem is real and deserves to be discussed in council. Then maybe, clarifications that the majority of us will make us think again and agree with them that the delay was unavoidable or physiological state (never say never).
The explanation for the delay in the Square is only a 3-point taken by our group. Surely the argument is more interesting on the treatment fee. By now everyone knows (surely not because of the Mayor & C) following a Constitutional Court ruling of 2008, the fee is not due to treatment in those municipalities without a sewage treatment plant. Our group has distributed some time ago between the people of the models to claim for the SASI! But so far no effect, and indeed to say True, the SASI has made a living claiming in 'last bill (still) the payment of treatment as if nothing had happened. The behavior of the SASI is unfair, illegitimate, but that discomfort, perhaps even more, is the attitude of the Mayor, except that invite citizens to desist from using in what could have run into legal consequences never specified, not gave no information on the subject, leaving the citizens literally ONLY. Through our proposal we want to bring the Mayor to do his duty, namely the interests of citizens. We want the mayor to call upon the SASI has set up the necessary documentation to be submitted ATO in order to make possible the recovery of sums wrongly paid by the citizens of Gessopalena who regularly made the request. It seems trivial, but surprisingly this has not happened yet. The Mayor (unfortunately) there is at SASI, but until now has not made itself felt a right to defend its citizens. Even the center where seems to have a space almost daily there are traces of its position on this issue !!!!! We'll see ... ... ... ... ... ..
Another point of our expertise is the approval of the rules for shooting video, audio advice. Argument is discussed for months and months. In the council in July there was a commitment to "write" with a specification of ways to govern in this particular matter. However this commitment there was no objective evidence nor any instigation of the majority wanted to cooperate! So in that next board will review the regulation submitted exclusively by our group that goes to cover, in our opinion, exhaustively the criteria and methods that will be shooting. Obviously we're sure to find filibuster, but this time he will be forced to take a final decision with clear implications !!!!!!
Finally, we can not overlook the fact that once again the Mayor we "rejected" an arbitrary question regularly presented. This time, stays out of the question through which we asked about the criteria under which handles the city bus (the green one!). Obviously this is an abuse because there is no law, and there is no regulation in place which is a limit to the questions and proposals. However there is enough meat for 22 to assist in the fire safe council to a very interesting ... .... ..
0 comments:
Post a Comment